Alexander Akwasi Acquah, the Member of Parliament for Akyem Oda, has defended the funds allocated to the National Cathedral project, insisting that every cedi spent is justified and worthwhile.
Speaking on the Angel Morning Show with Saddick Adams on Thursday, February 13, 2025, Acquah addressed ongoing criticisms, particularly from members of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), who have questioned the financial commitment to the project. According to him, the budget allocated for the cathedral is not only necessary but holds long-term value for Ghana.
As a former Vice Chair of the Trade, Tourism, and Industry Committee, Acquah shared insights into the project, revealing that he initially had reservations about the amount being spent. However, after reviewing the budgetary discussions and understanding the proposed impact, he changed his stance.
“If the budget had not been presented to us, I would still be questioning why such a significant sum of money is being spent on building a church” he said. “But after going through the budget review, I now see the long-term benefits and the potential value it brings to the country.”
Acquah acknowledged the concerns of those who believe the funds have gone to waste, especially since the project remains incomplete. However, he maintained that the expenditure is justified, emphasizing the importance of looking at the overall vision rather than focusing solely on its current state.
He further pointed out that significant amounts have been spent on architectural designs and preparatory measures, which should not be dismissed as wasted funds. According to him, the money invested so far has laid the foundation for what could become a major national and international attraction, benefiting Ghana’s tourism and cultural heritage.
Acquah urged Ghanaians to engage in a broader conversation about the project, encouraging a more informed and balanced discussion on its significance and potential impact. As debates over the cathedral’s funding continue, he called for unity in recognizing the long-term vision rather than politicizing the initiative.
