For the past months, the country has witnessed unfortunate trends in the government’s attempt to recoup funds allegedly misappropriated by some individuals under the erstwhile administration; the masked force men and the use of militaristic strategy of chasing alleged individuals, to the extent of invading into the private space of these alleged individuals with heavily armed men must be re-considered, it is totally against fundamental human right principles.
The showy arrests and use of strong tactics are signs that state-citizen relationships are headed in the wrong direction. Although fighting corruption and recovering state funds is justified and needed, the current approach to these matters is worrisome and a serious threat to national security. The approach seems unfair, politically fueled and absolutely contradictory to the tenets of Ghana’s democracy.
Undoubtedly, over the past few decades, Ghana has garnered significant international recognition for being a stable and democratic country among West African nations. The frequent use of excessive force by officials against those seen as opposition, groups that support society or people who criticise the government can result in lost public faith in the country’s legal and enforcement systems.
When partisan interests are behind actions taken by the police and military, some members of society feel marginalised and become less supportive of national development, which could cause a significant security problem.
When militia tactics are resorted to instead of peace dialogue and following legal steps, it sets the stage for laws to be interpreted and set by those who have power. While this kind of action might get public attention and relieve anger about corruption, it cannot assure the integrity of state institutions.
These current actions create a culture of political vendetta where people may want to get back at each other. This pattern of vengeful government strategies might be repeated, which could cause more political unrest in the country. These trends could set a distasteful tone that will make the youth reach the conclusion that being politically active requires forceful attacks and being violent.
Also, when the government doesn’t distinguish genuine anti-corruption actions from political actions, the trust in the justice system is automatically shoved under the carpet. Transparency, fairness and the protection of individuals’ liberty must be solidified at all costs.
Should officials only act against the political opposition and allow their supporters to escape justice, such efforts are not about justice but about using anti-corruption allegations to silence opponents.
The historical lessons cannot be ignored; violence and hooliganism cannot solve the problem, but rather create a vacuum for violence and atrocities. The peace of this country is an important commodity, and it can not be shoved under the carpet for political gains.
Perhaps, the government has to change its strategies-transparency, impartiality and respect for the law are the key principles for anti-corruption measures.
Political involvement should not affect the operations of security agencies, which must always act according to human rights laws. The media, civil society and judiciary should be given the power to carry out their duties without being bullied. Ghana will only maintain stability if all walk the democratic path together.
Again, the aggressive Rambo-style law enforcement in pursuit of state funds may succeed for a short time, yet will destroy national harmony and undermine the country’s democracy. Political figures in Ghana should be aware that their actions now have lasting implications for people down the years.
If they pick force over justice, they could leave a gap that may lead to more rebellion, unrest and political violence.
